This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cho, J. Articles by Trent, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Validity in qualitative research revisited

University of Wyoming, USA

Allen Trent

University of Wyoming, USA

Concerns with the issues of validity in qualitative research have dramatically increased. Traditionally, validity in qualitative research involved determining the degree to which researchers’ claims about knowledge corresponded to the reality (or research participants’ construction of reality) being studied. The authors note that recent trends have shown the emergence of two quite different approaches to the validity question within the literature on qualitative research. The authors categorize and label these ‘transactional’ validity and ‘transformational’ validity. While useful, the authors assert that neither approach is sufficient to meet the current needs of the field. The authors propose a recursive, process-oriented view of validity as an alternative framework.

Key Words: qualitative research • research validity

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Yount and J. Gittelsohn Comparing Reports of Health-Seeking Behavior From the Integrated Illness History and a Standard Child Morbidity Survey Journal of Mixed Methods Research, January 1, 2008; 2(1): 23 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]