|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Qualitative Research, Vol. 1, No. 3,
303-323 (2001)
The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing: some considerations on analysing interviews
Timothy John Rapley
Goldsmiths College, London
Considerable analytic attention has focused on interviewees' talk as 'accounts', or 'versions', rather than as direct reports of attitudes or perceptions. However, despite recognition of the 'co-construction of accounts', little analytic attention has been given to the interviewer as central in the production of the talk. With this attention, we are left with an analysis of some decontextualized-features-of-talk (or discourse/identities/narrative/repertoires/ rhetoric). By contrast, this article argues that interviews are inherently social encounters, dependent on the local interactional contingencies in which the speakers draw from, and co-construct, broader social norms. Through a close reading of one published paper and extracts from an interview, I document how interviewees and interviewers work to construct themselves as certain types-of-people in relation to the topic of the interview and reflexively the interview itself. I then show how a prescription from some interview methods texts document an ideal about interview practices. The analysis of the interview extracts shows this ideal-in-practice (cf. Hester and Francis, 1994). I argue that whatever ideals are practised, no single practice will gain 'better data' than the other practices. The 'data' obtained are highly dependent on and emerge from the specific local interactional context which is produced in and through the talk (and concomitant identity work) of the interviewee and interviewer. An awareness of this local context of data production is central to analysing interview data whatever analytic stance is taken when analysing the data.
Key Words: conversation analysis • interview methodology • moral adequacy • recreational drug use
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
I. Leudar, J. Hayes, J. Nekvapil, and J. Turner Baker
Hostility themes in media, community and refugee narratives
Discourse Society,
March 1, 2008;
19(2):
187 - 221.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Cook and K. Nunkoosing
Maintaining Dignity and Managing Stigma in the Interview Encounter: The Challenge of Paid-For Participation
Qual Health Res,
March 1, 2008;
18(3):
418 - 427.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Aguinaldo and T. Myers
A Discursive Approach to Disinhibition Theory: The Normalization of Unsafe Sex Among Gay Men
Qual Health Res,
February 1, 2008;
18(2):
167 - 181.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Mertkan-Ozunlu
Reflexive accounts about qualitative interviewing within the context of educational policy in North Cyprus
Qualitative Research,
November 1, 2007;
7(4):
447 - 459.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Manderson, E. Bennett, and S. Andajani-Sutjahjo
The social dynamics of the interview: age, class, and gender.
Qual Health Res,
December 1, 2006;
16(10):
1317 - 1334.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Roulston
Close encounters of the 'CA' kind: a review of literature analysing talk in research interviews
Qualitative Research,
November 1, 2006;
6(4):
515 - 534.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Galasinska
Border ethnography and post-communist discourses of nationality in Poland
Discourse Society,
September 1, 2006;
17(5):
609 - 626.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Watson
Unreliable narrators? 'Inconsistency' (and some inconstancy) in interviews
Qualitative Research,
August 1, 2006;
6(3):
367 - 384.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Abell, A. Locke, S. Condor, S. Gibson, and C. Stevenson
Trying similarity, doing difference: the role of interviewer self-disclosure in interview talk with young people
Qualitative Research,
May 1, 2006;
6(2):
221 - 244.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Suoninen and A. Jokinen
Persuasion in Social Work Interviewing
Qualitative Social Work,
December 1, 2005;
4(4):
469 - 487.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Tileaga
Accounting for extreme prejudice and legitimating blame in talk about the Romanies
Discourse Society,
September 1, 2005;
16(5):
603 - 624.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Engelsrud
The lived body as experience and perspective: methodological challenges
Qualitative Research,
August 1, 2005;
5(3):
267 - 284.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Benwell
'Lucky this is anonymous.' Ethnographies of reception in men's magazines: a 'textual culture' approach
Discourse Society,
March 1, 2005;
16(2):
147 - 172.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Collins, M. Shattell, and S. P. Thomas
Problematic Interviewee Behaviors in Qualitative Research
West J Nurs Res,
March 1, 2005;
27(2):
188 - 199.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Tileaga
Book Review: Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview
Discourse Studies,
February 1, 2005;
7(1):
141 - 143.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Puchta, J. Potter, and S. Wolff
Repeat receipts: a device for generating visible data in market research focus groups
Qualitative Research,
December 1, 2004;
4(3):
285 - 309.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Gronnerod
On the Meanings and Uses of Laughter in Research Interviews: Relationships between Interviewed Men and a Woman Interviewer
Young,
February 1, 2004;
12(1):
31 - 49.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Bradshaw
A Politics of Doing Social Research for Fishery Biologists, Managers and Industry
Qualitative Research,
December 1, 2003;
3(3):
359 - 376.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Roulston, K. deMarrais, and J. B. Lewis
Learning to Interview in the Social Sciences
Qualitative Inquiry,
August 1, 2003;
9(4):
643 - 668.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Potter
Review EssayStudying the Standardized Survey as Interaction
Qualitative Research,
August 1, 2003;
3(2):
269 - 278.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
